















Churchill and
the Jews
by ARTHUR HERMAN
"Why should we Anglo-Saxons apologize for being superior?" Winston Churchill
once growled in exasperation. "We are superior." Certainly Churchill's views
of what he and other late Victorians called the "lesser races," such as
blacks and East Indians, are very different from ours today. One might
easily assume that a self-described reactionary like Churchill, holding such
views, shared the anti-Semitism prevalent among Europe's ruling elites
before the Holocaust. But he did not, as Martin Gilbert vividly shows in
"Churchill and the Jews." By chronicling Churchill's warm dealings with
English and European Jews throughout his long career, and his heartfelt
support of Zionism, Mr. Gilbert conveys Churchill's deep admiration for the
Jewish people and captures his crucial role in creating the state of Israel.
Churchill offers the powerful example of a Western statesman who--unlike
other statesmen in his own time and ours--understood the malignant nature of
anti-Semitism and did what he could to oppose its toxic effects. His father,
Lord Randolph Churchill, had been a close friend and ally to many wealthy
British Jews, almost notoriously so, given the rancid snobbery of his
circles. The son rarely failed to follow his father's inclinations, in this
matter as in others. Jews like the Rothschilds and the banker Sir Ernest
Cassel helped to advance Winston Churchill's early career (including
watching over his finances after his father's death), and he repaid their
support in part by publicly condemning the kind of anti-Semitism that was
all too common in England's upper classes. But his actions were not merely
an expression of personal thanks.
_________________________________________
A student of history, Churchill came to feel that Judaism was the bedrock of
traditional Western moral and political principles--and Churchill was of a
generation that preferred to talk about principles instead of "values." For
Europeans to turn against the Jew, he argued, was for them to strike at
their own roots and reject an essential part of their civilization--"that
corporate strength, that personal and special driving power" that Jews had
brought for hundreds of years to Europe's arts, sciences and institutions.
To deny Jews a national homeland was therefore an act of ingratitude.
Churchill became a keen backer of the Balfour Declaration of 1917, which
broached the idea of creating a Jewish homeland in Palestine. As a friend to
Zionist leader Chaim Weizman, and as colonial secretary after World War I,
Churchill made establishing such a homeland a matter of urgency. "The hope
of your race for so many centuries will be gradually realized here,"
Churchill told a Jewish audience in Jerusalem during his visit in March
1921, "not only for your own good, but for the good of all the world." By
"all the world" Churchill most pointedly meant to include Palestine's Arabs.
As Mr. Gilbert recounts, Churchill was dismayed and disgusted by Arab
resistance to Jewish immigration and settlement in Palestine. "The Jews have
a far more difficult task than you," he told Arab representatives, since
"you only have to enjoy your own possessions," while the Jewish emigrants
from Europe and elsewhere would have to carve a society out of a barren
wilderness. Yet Churchill was convinced that Arab civilization would benefit
from contact with an entrepreneurial and morally centered people. "Speaking
entirely as a non-Jew," he wrote, "I look on the Jews as the natural
importers of western leaven so necessary for countries in the Near East." At
the same time, Churchill tried to ensure that Palestinian Arabs got their
own national homeland. It was Churchill who, as colonial secretary, decided
to separate Transjordan (modern-day Jordan) from the rest of Palestine,
assuming that Transjordan would become the site of the Arabs' future state
and that other parts of Palestine (including the West Bank of the Jordan
River) would be open to Jewish settlement. Churchill was to be disappointed
by the results of his Middle Eastern efforts, as Arabs hunted down and
murdered Jewish settlers by the hundreds in the 1920s and 1930s--just at the
time when Adolf Hitler was building his own regime around the persecution of
the Jews in Germany. As early as 1930 Churchill realized that the Nazis'
anti-Jewish policies carried the stench of an ancient evil. "Tell your boss
from me," he said to a Hitler acquaintance in the late summer of 1932, as
the Nazi Party was on the verge of power, "that anti-Semitism may be a good
starter but it is a bad finisher." In December 1942, Churchill--now prime
minister--learned from a Roman Catholic member of the Polish resistance, a
man named Jan Karsky, that thousands of Jews were being rounded up and sent
by cattle cars to what turned out to be the death camp at Belzec, in eastern
Poland. Churchill used the Karsky report to compel the Allies, including the
Russians, to condemn "a bestial policy of cold-blooded extermination" in
Germany--although he understood that the best way to halt the slaughter
would be the speedy destruction of Hitler's empire. The chief of Britain's
air staff, Sir Charles Portal, warned that any air raids "avowedly conducted
on account of the Jews would be an asset to enemy propaganda," and Churchill
reluctantly bowed to his advice. Nonetheless, in 1943 he wanted a film that
documented the atrocities committed against the Jews to be shown to every
American serviceman before the invasion of Europe.
________________________________________
After the war, Churchill felt that the most fitting response to the
Holocaust would be to punish those guilty of the most horrific crimes
against the Jews and to fulfill the promise of a Jewish homeland that he and
Britain had made almost 30 years earlier. When Ernest Bevin, Britain's
Labour Party foreign minister, hesitated to recognize Israel nine months
after its founding, for fear of inflaming Arab opinion, Churchill swung back
hard: "Whether the Right Honorable Gentleman likes it or not, the coming
into being of a Jewish State in Palestine is an event in world history to be
viewed in the perspective, not of a generation or a century, but in the
perspective of a thousand, two thousand, or even three thousand years."
Israel was just recompense, Churchill felt, not only for what the Jews of
Europe had lost but for what they had given to civilization over the
centuries. This view, of course, no longer prevails. Today the existence of
Israel is apparently something to be regretted, even deplored, not only in
Arab capitals but in European ones and on American university campuses.
Paradoxically, such feelings intensified after 9/11, an event that should
have made us all aware of who the friends of Western civilization really
are--and who its enemies. Martin Gilbert's book reminds us that
anti-Semitism is the dark turn of the modern mind against itself, and a form
of cultural patricide.
Sent By Dariush Fakheri



